The Mess of Ebooks | Peer to Peer Review

I’ve run into a few problems with library ebooks lately that have made me even more skeptical of them as complete replacements for print books in libraries. Since skeptics of library ebooks are sometimes considered luddites or reactionaries, I should go ahead and add the disclaimer that I really like ebooks that I don’t acquire from the library. I did a quick calculation of the books I’ve read since mid-January and of those 33 books, 27 were ebooks. Some of them were several hundred pages long, but reading them on a good ereader was generally a pleasant experience.
Wayne Biven-TatumI’ve run into a few problems with library ebooks lately that have made me even more skeptical of them as complete replacements for print books in libraries. Since skeptics of library ebooks are sometimes considered Luddites or reactionaries, I should go ahead and add the disclaimer that I really like ebooks that I don’t acquire from the library. I did a quick calculation of the books I’ve read since mid-January, and of those 33 titles, 27 were ebooks. Some of them were several hundred pages long, but reading them on a good ereader was generally a pleasant experience. And then I turn to the library offerings. The first thing I notice is that it’s difficult to replicate that pleasant reading experience for the most part, for a number of reasons. Reading on a good ereader is like reading a well-formatted tight reading copy of a codex in several ways. The font and background can be adjusted to suit your preferences. Sometimes that can be done with library ebooks, sometimes not. Occasionally, they can be downloaded and reformatted, but mostly they cannot. When we turn to library ebooks, what we find is a vast array of substandard choices, and the lack of standardization means that readers have to figure out and adjust to every new platform. That might be okay if all the platforms were excellent, but they’re not. All of them seem to have accidental or deliberate ways to make the reading experience poorer. This standardization problem has mostly been solved by academic e-journals. Most e-journals offer their articles in PDF format. Sure, there are still journals that don’t consider reading on a small screen, like the ones that still use two-column formatting, but for the most part if you download an article, you know what you’re getting every time, just like picking up a book. Whereas with library ebooks, you’re never quite sure what you’re going to get. There are always possible problems. Consider a recent examination of Oxford Scholarship Online (OSO) in this blog post by a philosopher at UC-Boulder that was discussed by Inside Higher Ed. He notes a number of issues with OSO, including formatting problems and oddities with handling footnotes and PDF downloads. Oxford University Press (OUP) responded in the comments, but the gist of the conversation was frustration with the platform from several other scholars. The problem is compounded since Boulder, like many libraries, stopped collecting the print editions of the books in OSO, so the only option for the user is the OSO copy. And then there are all the other platforms. Ebrary is a popular one. I’ve never managed to read an entire ebook on the website itself because the reader always seems slow and clunky. It’s true that some Ebrary books can be downloaded into the easier-to-read Adobe Digital Editions (ADE) application. The first time you can do it in 18 easy steps. After going through those 18 steps, you may then download the book into ADE for two weeks, which is considerably less than the checkout time for most of the print books in my library’s collection for any class of library users. Some platforms are easy to read on but have other common limitations. I love the content at Past Masters, for example. It’s great to have access to standard critical editions of philosophers in their original languages, as it offers with Kant, Nietzsche, and others. However, unless you want to read online, it’s still got the printing and download limitations of the other platforms. Other platforms have different arbitrary and unnecessary restrictions. Few allow people to just download a book and be done with it, so nothing is going to be easy, even though we’re paying for this stuff. Go into a JSTOR ebook at my library, and you get this notice: “There is no printing or copying allowed.” Because no one would ever want to copy a sentence to paste into an article they’re writing. Or maybe it’s just a limitation of its Flash reader, of which my first thought was, “Flash? Really?” Supposedly you can get an online PDF, but when I downloaded it and tried to open it, I got a notice that the document failed to load. Maybe it was that I didn’t have the FileOpen plugin, whatever that is. I could go back and, no, wait, I don’t care anymore. Not another 18 simple steps. If I didn’t absolutely have to read this book, I would abandon it, and I did. It’s not me, JSTOR ebooks, it’s you, or if it’s not you, it’s the publishers. So we have multiple reading platforms that are sometimes problematic in their own right, formats that aren’t suitable for all types of devices, restrictions on the numbers of simultaneous users, the inability to lend ebooks via ILL, and other inconsistent restrictions on printing, copying, or downloading library ebooks that vary from platform to platform. The ebook landscape for academic libraries is a mess. And what’s more, it’s a mess for which we’re paying.
Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


Lisa Horowitz

I'm with you Wayne. At my institution, we have a few choices when buying certain individual e-books. But they have these weird viewing options (such as those you mention where you can download but only into some special software not used in any other context, or else online, where most people do not read, etc.). And if you want to to download or print, the restrictions are unbelievable! We had a user trying to download a single chapter of a book. It happened to be 83 pages. He wanted to be able to a) read it, yes, but b) refer to it away from his computer. However, the limit for downloading and printing from that book from that vendor was 30 pages. So, honestly, we did a workaround to get a copy of the whole darn thing into a PDF. Was that really so bad for the vendor? Is it any different from copying a chapter of the book 20 years ago, and keeping the copy? Even Overdrive, which someone mentioned above, despite its required software download, works better than the options that I seem to have. I am not a big fan of buying e-books. On the other hand, people really appreciate being able to get the books online ...

Posted : Nov 20, 2014 01:17


August Wainwright

Wayne, "..the easier-to-read Adobe Digital Editions application. The first time you can do it in 18 easy steps. After going through those 18 steps, you may then download the book into Adobe Digital Editions for two weeks" And if it's Adobe DE4, then you also get unwanted spying along with those 18 steps: http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/10/06/adobe-spying-users-collecting-data-ebook-libraries/ But I also wanted to point out that indie authors and small publishers are having conversations about these exact issues in reference to libraries. DRM free, unlimited use, at low (close to retail) costs, and no recurring licensing contracts (meaning "ownership"). And very smart developers are working on potential solutions that utilize modern APIs and SDKs to integrate ebook purchases with current library systems. There's still lots of work to be done, and I'm speaking in reference to public more than academic libraries, but new solutions are coming.

Posted : Oct 09, 2014 01:54

Wayne BT

Yes, I saw that story. A good reason to avoid ADE4, if that's even possible for most public libraries these days. DRM-free, unlimited use books at close to retail costs (which are generally higher for scholarly books anyway) is definitely what I want to see, and some publishers are doing something close, such as Springer or Bloomsbury, which has a new ebooks platform I tried and liked. The only issue I have is that the publishers providing them won't at the moment sell individual titles on their platform, which reduces my freedom to select which books I would choose to buy for the library. The packages are subject-based and provide much more flexibility than most Big Deal journal packages, but I'd still like to be able to select such ebooks with the same freedom I select print books.

Posted : Oct 09, 2014 01:54


Ryan

It seems the problem you're running into is mostly in the academic space with products such as Ebrary, JSTOR, OSO, and the like. Not that public libraries haven't run into this problem with our more academic offerings like GVRL but the consumer products work well. Reading an OverDrive or 3M book via the App on a tablet or on a black & white eReader has generally been a pleasant experience in terms of formatting, etc. These products have their own problems that extend well beyond simple format and usability (DRM & ownership chief among them) obviously but they're nearly at Amazon or B&N levels for ease of use now.

Posted : Oct 07, 2014 01:48


Jeroen Bosman

It is indeed a bit of a mess. But it does not have to be that way. If you regard each book chapter as something comparable to a journal article it is easy to see how things can be fairly standardised and easy to work with: a seperate PDF + ePUB for each chapter and front/back matter, without any DRM. I always try to avoid any DRM restricted books. Publishers that DRM all their books just do not get any orders. It strikes me that publishers with a lot of journal experience are much less afraid to offer DRMless books. If every chapter has its own metadata it is also easier to list them in Scopus,WoS and the like. Publishers that are ahead in this will see that our patrons find their offerings easier to find, use and, yes, share, just as with PDF journal articles. That, in turn will trigger librarians to buy more from that publisher. World total book budgets can only be spent once. In my view the money will go to e-books and book packages that conform to the principles outlined above. I only ever by DRMed books if a patron specifically requests that title, twice, after I have offered non-DRM alternatives.

Posted : Oct 06, 2014 09:02


Heidi McGregor, JSTOR

Thanks for this timely discussion. I think we all read this and thought, on some level, it would be great if ebooks could be available in the same way that journals are now. Standard approaches, unlimited usage, site-wide access, the ability to re-use content. The good news is that many ebooks do work this way. Over 17,000 (about 60%) of the books in the JSTOR program offer unlimited concurrent use; unlimited DRM-free PDF downloads; unlimited printing and copy/paste; and interlibrary loan for ebook chapters. In effect, these ebooks work just like the journal articles on JSTOR, and these are being used on many campuses today. But of course, then there are the other books – the ones that have the experience you described, which is universally less than ideal. We agree that we can all do better here. We are taking in library feedback all the time, sharing this with publishers, and considering what changes can be made. So, thank you for your comments and the opportunity to clarify that your experience is not the only experience or even the most common one. We agree they should all be good though.

Posted : Oct 04, 2014 02:08


View More Comments

RELATED 

Get connected. Join our global community of more than 200,000 librarians and educators.

Get access to 8000+ annual reviews of books, ebooks, and more

As low as $13.50/month