Advertisement
Articles

Obama Proposes $20.3 Million Reduction in Library Funding

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |
By Michael Kelley Feb 14, 2011

President Obama delivered a budget proposal to Congress on Monday that would cut federal library funding by 9.5 percent.

Obama is requesting $242.6 million for the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), which is down from $265.9 million in FY11 (or $282.2 million if $16.3 million in earmarks is included). The Library Services and Technology Act, which IMLS administers, is budgeted for $193.2 million, down from $213.5 million.

(Obama's overall $3.73 trillion budget plan for FY12, which begins October 1, is a reduction of 2.4 percent from FY11.)

In a "congressional justification" presentation, Susan Hildreth, the newly appointed head of IMLS, defended Obama's request.

"I share the President's desire to find budget savings throughout the federal government, and I think you will find that this request is reasonable while continuing to serve the museum, library, and information service needs of the American people," she wrote.

Mamie Bittner, the deputy director of IMLS's Office of Policy, Planning, Research, and Communications, would not comment on any budget deliberations that took place between IMLS and the White House's Office of Management and Budget since OMB policy deems such discussions confidential.

About 84 percent of the library money ($161.3 million) would go to the Grants to State Library Agencies program, the largest federal program for libraries. Grants are awarded annually according to a population-based formula and are used for statewide services. States must match the grants, and they must also comply with maintenance of effort requirements, which is why states that have proposed sharply reducing their state library budgets, such as California and Texas, now find this federal funding also in danger.

The federal money also funds National Leadership Grants, Native American and Native Hawaiian Library Services Grants, and the Laura Bush 21st Century Librarian Grants.

"Rapid societal shifts are challenging museums and libraries to reinvent themselves," Hildreth wrote. "With this budget, IMLS is rigorously examining all of its grant programs, research, and leadership initiatives to ensure that every dollar is helping libraries and museums meet this challenge."

In her congressional justification, Hildreth said the IMLS will undertake new initiatives with this budget, including developing guidelines to ensure that librarians have training to help patrons use e-government applications and to help librarians assess their need for public access workstations, portable devices, and bandwidth.

American Library Association (ALA) president Roberta Stevens, however, was critical of Obama's proposal.

"We believe President Obama's request to cut funding to library services is short-sighted, when libraries are being used by millions of people every day. When we invest in them, we invest in the future of our country," she said in a statement. "We ask Congress to restore the support for America's libraries."

On December 22, Obama signed the Museum and Library Services Act of 2010 (PL 111-340), which reauthorized and modified the statutory underpinning (20 USC Chapter 72) of most IMLS activities.

The 2010 reauthorization, the first since 2003, codifies IMLS's responsibility for library data collection, which was formerly the under the authority of the National Center for Education Statistics. It also transfers to IMLS the functions of the former National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, which provided advice to the President and Congress on national and international library and information policies.




Reader Comments (4)


Federal spending needs to be cut. Everyone is able to agree with this statement, yet no one wants to see cuts in funding for programs that we (individually) think are important. I think that a 9.5% reduction in IMLS funding, while not perfect, isn't horrible, and I agree with IMLS President Susan Hildreth's remarks that reasonable budget trimming across the board needs to happen. I think that ALA President Roberta Stevens issued a statement that was well-meaning, but ultimately not helpful. It was a stock answer--support libraries--without any kind of useful suggestions for how to do so within the larger framework of necessary cuts to federal spending. As a librarian and a citizen of this country I think that Obama's plans to cut spending are critical at this time. I only wish that his overall budget proposal for FY12 trimmed out more than 2.4% of FY11!

Posted by ConcernedLibrarian on February 16, 2011 10:53:40AM

I think that this may indeed be a reasonable cut when looked at as a percentage of the amounts from previous years, but would truly love to see some other similar cuts happen in the agencies that no one wants to touch, but would do the most good toward balancing the budget, Medicare and Social Security, WIC, Food Stamps and all other kinds of assistance. If you are going to cut in an attempt to balance the budget, you should cut everywhere. Share the pain equally.

Posted by RuralLibrarian on February 16, 2011 09:14:45AM

We would not have to cut funding if the top income earners would pay their fair share of taxes. The highest tax rate an American will face in 2011 is 35 percent. Even if the dollar value is more, this is only marginally higher than the 25 percent paid by a married couple, filing separately, each making $34,500. These tax rates seem fair at first glance, until you consider since 1987, wealthy Americans have seen some of the lowest tax burdens since 1931, when those earning $100,000 or more paid only 25 percent in taxes.  In 1932, in response to the Great Depression, tax brackets of 56-63 percent were established for those making $100,000-$1 million annually. At the peak of American economic splendor, the 1950s, tax rates reached as high as 91 percent for those making $200,000 and above. (Think $2 million by today's standards.) These rates have declined steadily since, allowing the gap between the haves and have-nots to reach the current unimaginable levels. All of this assumes these taxpayers are actually paying those obligations, not paying tax attorneys to help them hide assets so their tax burdens are actually significantly less.  Want sufficient federal funding for programs? Those who grew up most in the privilege of America need to give back to it to keep that privilege alive. Until the government demands from its most capable citizens sufficient money to run our federal programs, federal spending is going to continue to be a shell game as program after program is cut and reshuffled from our dwindling pool of resources. (All figures cited came from "U.S. Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History, 1913-2011," posted March 23, 2011 at http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/151.html.)

Posted by AngryInIndiana on April 1, 2011 06:43:24AM

How about cutting military spending 100%. Suddenly there's money available for everything good in this country like healthcare, libraries, housing and food, clothing and shelter for the poor. We can all have real tax cuts. After that we can pay all government officials minimum wage to save further money.

Posted by Frank Stark on October 19, 2011 07:58:54PM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information


 

Welcome the LJ Archives.

This archive site is the home to all LJ articles published prior to January 2012;
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.