Advertisement
Articles

Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Director To Step Down

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |
By Michael Kelley Dec 16, 2010

The Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh (CLP) is going to lose a director but keep four branches for at least another year. Barbara Mistick, the library's director, told the Board of Trustees on December 13 that she would step down from her position when her contract expires on May 31.

"I'm grateful to have had the opportunity to lead Pittsburgh's legendary Carnegie Library system during the past five years," Mistick, the first woman to direct the system, said in a press release.

Mistick's future plans were still in flux.

"I'm a Pittsburgher, and I love Pittsburgh, and I love the library, and I am looking at other options that involve education in this city," she told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

At the same time, the 115-year-old system is facing an uncertain financial future, although the board has decided to repeal a 2009 action plan that would have closed four branches at the end of 2010, according to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

"More important than the announcement that [Mistick] will be leaving in May is the announcement that the board is formally scrapping the plan to close libraries in 2011," Chuck Staresinic, president of the Friends of the Lawrenceville Library, told the Tribune-Review.

At the same board meeting in which Mistick announced her impending departure, the board approved a 2011 operating budget of $23,956,000. CPL has lost nearly $2 million in state funding over the past two years, $407,000 in FY11.

Branch closings fended off
But the Allegheny Regional Asset District (RAD), the major source of revenue for the 19-branch system, increased its FY11 allocation by $528,000, to $18.1 million, helping CLP to cobble together a budget that avoided the branch closures.

The RAD distributes one-half of the one percent Allegheny County sales tax to parks, libraries, cultural and civic entities, and sports facilities. The bulk, 32 percent, goes to libraries.

The Carnegie Library, whose workers are not unionized, has a voluntary retirement program and unfilled vacancies that have allowed some savings, but the board appointed a Task Force on Library Sustainability earlier this year to explore ways to keep the library's long-term funding viable.

The task force recommended that the system improve its advocacy efforts, increase donor support and RAD allocations, launch an endowment campaign, and explore a ballot initiative to obtain some form of dedicated funding.

"Organizations like libraries live in a precarious existence from year to year," said Jacqui Fiske Lazo, the board's president. "Cutting back essential services and relying on volatile funding that does not keep pace with inflation is not a sustainable model," she said in a press release.

As Library Journal reported, an audit conducted earlier this year for RAD, which was sent to the task force, suggested that the Carnegie system's projection of a $4.4 million deficit by 2014 may be overstated.




Reader Comments (1)


These articles tell an incomplete story. Dr. Mistick has reshaped the Carnegie Library of Pgh. on the backs of its employees. All told, the Technical and Public Service staffs have been reduced by some 20 positions in the last 5 years, om top of the reductions during the Herb Elish years. She has built up a well paid support staff of Marketing and HR people with little knowledge or concern for library operations. Outside of the Deputy Director, Librarians are almost entirely absent from strategic decision making - they're an afterthought. According to an independent investigative audit done by Parente Beard, (http://radworkshere.org/docs/CLP_ParenteBeard_Report_and_Ex hibits.pdf) "The CLP’s President/Director salary of $165,643 in 2007 falls within the upper range of the Director salaries." "The CLP’s beginning librarian salary is in the lower tier of the comparables at approximately $32,000 per year." "Benefit costs as a percent of revenues for the CLP (11 percent) are comparable to all other library systems, with the CLP benefits being in the lower ranges of the comparable systems." "For the comparison year of 2007, Dr. Mistick’s salary was within the range, albeit the high end of the range, for Directors in the library systems identified as comparable to the CLP." All this while her frontline clerical staff earn less than $9.50 per hour, and the librarians are overwhelmingly lower middle-class today. It has been a period in office measured by aloofness, slavish parroting of uninformed "best practices", and gross misdirection provided by advisory staff with no connections to the community and poor guidance for the library's board.

Posted by Roger Marx on December 16, 2010 03:58:24PM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information


 

Welcome the LJ Archives.

This archive site is the home to all LJ articles published prior to January 2012;
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.