Library Journal Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to LJ Magazine
Email
Learn RSS

Tennant: Digital Libraries   



Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)


The Desire for Digital Obsolescence

October 30, 2009 Not long ago I wrote about information on the Internet that should go away. Sure, there's the photo of you at that party that you sincerely wish would disappear, but I'm also talking about just plain outdated information, such as how to fix a software problem for a version of an application or operating system that is no longer used by anyone on this planet.

So imagine my surprise when someone whose opinions actually matter happened to agree with me. He was interviewed on NPR's hit show "Talk of the Nation," no less. It turns out that this Viktor Mayer-Schonberger has even written a book on the topic: Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. The dude totally beat me to it. Who knew I was channeling a genius? I sure didn't. But enough about me.

NPR put up an excerpt from the book, from which I've extracted this tempting morsel:
Do we want a future that is forever unforgiving because it is unforgetting? "Now a stupid adolescent mistake can take on major implications and go on their records for the rest of their lives," comments Catherine Davis, a PTA co-president. If we had to worry that any information about us would be remembered for longer than we live, would we still express our views on matters of trivial gossip, share personal experiences, make various political comments, or would we self-censor? The chilling effect of perfect memory alters our behavior. Both Snyder and Feldmar said that in hindsight they would have acted differently. "Be careful what you post online," said Snyder, and Feldmar added perceptively "I should warn people that the electronic footprint you leave on the Net will be used against you. It cannot be erased." But the demise of forgetting has consequences much wider and more troubling than a frontal onslaught on how humans have constructed and maintained their reputation over time. If all our past activities, transgressions or not, are always present, how can we disentangle ourselves from them in our thinking and decision-making? Might perfect remembering make us as unforgiving to ourselves as to others?
It's ironic that while some information that can be easily seen as useful and worthy of retention all too easily disappears (as various government documents have in the past), while other information that is worse than useless remains available to dog us for the rest of our days. I'm afraid this topic is a bit of a tangent for me, since libraries can do quite a bit to solve the former, but virtually nothing to solve the latter.


Posted by Roy Tennant on October 30, 2009 | Comments (1)


Industries: News & Features
Email
Learn RSS


October 30, 2009
In response to: The Desire for Digital Obsolescence
Mike G. commented:

The consequences of an unforgetting society are interesting to ponder. I wonder if there will be a time when unforgettability is no longer perceived as a problem simply because there will be too much information to dig through to find the bit worth forgetting.

I rankle a bit at the notion of "useless information." Who gets to determine what's useless? What is uninteresting to you may be fascinating to a digital historian, or to someone doing text mining, or to digital archaeologists of the future.

This was thought-provoking, Roy. Thanks.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

Advertisement

Advertisements





©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites