Advertisement
Articles

E-Reference Ratings

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |

An evaluation of 44 subscription-based electronic resources in five social science categories

Reviewed by Julie Zamostny -- Library Journal, 11/15/2009


E-Reference Ratings
by Subject

When we first launched the E-Reference Ratings collection development tool in last year's Reference Announcements supplement (LJ 11/15/08), we promised to update it frequently to help public and academic librarians stay on top of the growing universe of electronic resources.

In this fourth revamp to the feature—following the addition of Travel & Tourism and Genealogy in March 2009 and the expansion of the Current Events category in August 2009—Julie Zamostny, Reference & Educational Services Librarian at Hood College in Frederick, MD, does a mammoth job of upgrading Social Sciences. She not only revisits products she reviewed last year but adds many more, increasing the total number of resources reviewed in the category to 44.

The resources have been broken down into several subcategories to facilitate easier browsing and encourage comparisons among similar products, including Communications, Education/Vocation, Law & Crime, Psychology, and Sociology.

If you are unfamiliar with E-Reference Ratings, take a moment to read the “criteria” legend, which explains what attributes we consider when perusing each product, and the “ratings” legend to see what the various stars mean. And don't forget to email your feedback and suggestions for future coverage.—Mirela Roncevic, Reference Editor, mroncevic@reedbusiness.com

 

Criteria

Scope range and breadth of content

Writing quality, quantity, and authority of the writing; consideration of the audience

Designvisual appeal; strengths and weakness of the interface

Bells & whistles inclusion of multimedia files, interactive maps, blogs, and other features

Ease of use logic behind the organization; efficiency of the search mechanisms

Linking cross-searchability with other files; ability to integrate with and link to other products

Ratings (for first six criteria; see separate explanation for value)

* poor/insufficient

** satisfactory/sufficient

*** good/plentiful

**** excellent/comprehensive

Value

Value is a relative term, taking into consideration not only cost but myriad related factors. If a product is expensive, does its comprehensiveness and quality warrant the high cost? Are too much time and energy required to find material, given the price? Is it a narrowly defined, inexpensive product that may receive heavy use in a small public library?





 
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.