Advertisement
Articles

ALA Warns Libraries: Google's Calling, So Here Are Questions

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |

Libraries should press Google about pricing, privacy, censorship

Norman Oder -- Library Journal, 05/14/2009

Go back to the
Academic Newswire
for more stories
  • Google is approaching libraries
  • ALA wants Google to respond to issues raised by library community
  • Fairness hearing October 7

(For a set of links, go to LibraryJournal.com/GoogleBookSearchSettlement.)

Little more than a week after three major library organizations filed comments with the federal court overseeing the proposed Google Book Search Settlement, calling for vigororous oversight, Google representatives have begun contacting library leaders with its perspective on the settlement—an effort that the American Library Association (ALA) Washington Office warns may be a “public relations campaign."

Questions for Google
ALA suggests several questions for libraries to ask Google. The first involves pricing. “Since no other comparable product or service currently exists, how will Google keep from disparities in access to its product if subscription prices are, or become, too expensive?” ALA asks. And what mechanism would libraries use to challenge pricing?

Beyond Google’s publicly stated commitment to privacy rights, what solid assurances can Google offer about privacy, ALA asks, noting that the issue was not mentioned in the settlement.

Also, given that Google can omit up to 15% of in-copyright, but not commercially available books it has scanned from libraries, what criteria will Google use in choosing those books and how will it avoid censorship pressures?

October 7 hearing
“Moving forward, it is important to remember that this proposed settlement that broadly outlines the terms and conditions Google, the AAP and the Authors Guild reached during private negotiations is not yet final,” observes ALA. “Recently, the judge presiding over the case extended the deadline for filing comments to the court by four months to September 4, 2009, and scheduled a final fairness hearing for October 7, 2009.”

Read more Newswire stories:

Elsevier Journal Scandal Provokes Significant Librarian Response

Cornell Library Lifts Restrictions on Public Domain Works

ALA Warns Libraries: Google's Calling, So Here Are Questions

ICOLC Calls for OCLC To Withdraw Proposed Records Policy and Start Anew


Columns:
Serendipity and the Study Hall | Peer to Peer Review

Sacred Places on Campus: The Power of the Library | From the Bell Tower


ProQuest products available through Dialog channels; Credo expands advisory board; Serials Solutions adds medical resource enhancements; 3M and Vocera partner on communications tech

People and Academic Briefs

Best Sellers in Philosophy





 
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.