Library Journal Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to LJ Magazine

Lessig: In Google Settlement, Orphan Works the Big Loser?

Andrew Albanese -- Library Journal, 10/30/2008 1:39:00 PM

Go back to the
Academic Newswire
for more stories
As LJ reported throughout September, the library community and its allies came close to getting a long sought after orphan works bill through Congress—earning passage in the Senate, before stalling at the feet of the “dark archive” proponents in the House. While Association of Research Libraries (ARL) associate executive director Prue Adler has said she hoped the Senate bill would be picked up and the orphan works process re-started in the next Congress, could the recent Google settlement complicate, or help that battle?

“The biggest loser in this whole battle is the Orphan Works legislation,” noted Stanford University professor Lawrence Lessig, who opined against the bill, last year in a New York Times article. “If anyone needed evidence to demonstrate that it is WAY TOO EARLY for Congress to be passing massive new bureaucratic overlays to copyright to deal with the important problem of orphan works, this is the evidence,” Lessig blogged. “Let’s let this private alternative develop, while Congress puts away its billion-factor balancing tests for regulating access to orphan works."

In its release on the settlement, Google suggested that the settlement would help address the orphan works problem: “We think the Registry will help address the orphan works problem for books in the U.S., making it easier for people who want to use older books. Since the Book Rights Registry will also be responsible for distributing the money Google collects to authors and publishers, there will be a strong incentive for rightsholders to come forward and claim their works.”

Ironically, both Google and the Association of American Publishers disagree with Lessig on the orphan works bill and are strong supporters of the legislation. In addition, while the Google settlement offers incentives for copyright owners to come forward, that is meaningless for the millions of works truly orphaned, not just books, works that have no clear copyright owner, nor does it ease the potential for incurring damages currently blocking any use of these works.  

“This settlement only deals with a tiny slice of the orphan works problem, published books.  It does not address photographs, illustrations, musical compositions, and unpublished works such as letters,” noted attorney Jonathan Band. “Accordingly, orphan works legislation remains of critical importance to cultural institutions such as libraries, archives, museums, and public broadcasters.”

Read more Newswire stories:

Harvard Slams Settlement, Opts Out of Google Deal; Others React with Caution

Christian Science Monitor To Abandon Daily Print; NIH Partners with Bibliotheca; CAB Abstracts Gets Full Text

Library Journal Extends Deadline for Librarian of the Year Award to November 17, 2008

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links




 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Norman Oder
    LJ Insider

    October 28, 2009
    Is Burning CDs from the Library a Copyright Violation?
    One of the most interesting things in a Chicago Tribune article about whether burning CDs borrowed f...
    More
  • Margaret Heilbrun
    In the Bookroom

    September 25, 2009
    English Vacation, English Reading
    Here are some bibliographic gleanings from my vacation earlier this month in England, my first ...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Design Institute 2007
    December 11, 2007 at Chicago's Harold Washington Library Center:Design Institute 2007
  • Learning Gardens
    New York's GreenBranches program links the library to the street.
  • Green Picks: LBD May 2007
    Want to reduce your library's carbon footprint? Join the Cradle-to-Cradle revolution. Helen Milling shares the green products her firm is using.
Advertisements





LJ NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

LJ BookSmack
LJXPRESS
LJ ACADEMIC NEWSWIRE
LJ REVIEW ALERT
LJ Criticas Review Alert
©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites