Advertisement
Articles

New Plan Seeks a 'Big Tent' for a National Digital Library

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
Print |
RSS |
Share | |
By Michael Kelley Dec 15, 2010

A new effort is under way to create a blueprint for a comprehensive national digital library that will put the country's cultural heritage only a mouse click away.

The Berkman Center for Internet and Society, a research program at Harvard Law School, announced December 13 that it will administer a collaborative effort whose goal is to create an overarching and open governing structure under which ongoing digitization projects, such as the HathiTrust and others, would willingly work.

The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation will provide the funding for the exploratory initiative, which is being billed as the "Digital Public Library of America."

"The idea is to create a big tent where lots of people can work hard toward a public-spirited solution," John Palfrey, the Faculty Co-Director at the Berkman Center and the Vice Dean of Library and Information Resources at Harvard Law School, told LJ. "It's not a competitive effort. It's meant to be complementary to its core."

Palfrey is head of the initiative's 11-member steering committee.

"What this will look like precisely is the work that lies immediately ahead of us," he said. "It's an exciting idea that could mobilize a lot of people with energy, expertise, and commitment to the world of ideas in a digital-plus era."

Workshops planned for 2011
The steering committee will coordinate a series of workshops next year with the goal of building a consensus about legal, technical, financial, governance, and content questions.

David Ferriero, the archivist of the United States, has offered to host a plenary meeting in the early summer of 2011, according to a press release from the Berkman Center.

"I'm more pleased than I can say, and I hope I can contribute something useful," Jerome McGann, a member of the steering committee and John Stewart Bryan University Professor at the University of Virginia, told LJ. "I see this as a remarkable, even an epochal, initiative in public education,"

McGann said Robert Darnton, the director of the Harvard University Library and a member of the steering committee, galvanized the effort through his writings in the New York Review of Books. A group of more than 40 people from various public and private institutions attended an exploratory workshop about the project held October 1-2 at the Radcliffe Center in Cambridge.

In a recent article, Darnton wrote about how the United States is lagging behind other countries in national digitization efforts.

"The Dutch are now digitizing every Dutch book, pamphlet, and newspaper produced from 1470 to the present," Darnton wrote. "President [Nicholas] Sarkozy of France announced last November that he would make €750 million available to digitize the nation's cultural 'patrimony.' And the Japanese Diet voted for a two-year, 12.6 billion yen crash program to digitize their entire national library. If the Netherlands, France, and Japan can do it, why can't the United States?"

'A big ocean to boil'
In the case of France, a report from the French Senate's finance committee in March concluded that the effort would most likely require a partnership with Google, despite Sarkozy's unease with that company's role in the digitization of France's cultural assets.

The report said that "with the Bibliotheque Nationale's current resources, it would take about 750 million euros and 375 years to digitize the entire collection [about 15 million books]." With Google, it would probably only require ten years, the report noted.

Palfrey said Google's role is one of the elements the workshops will help define.

"This is not an anti-Google or a pro-Google initiative," Palfrey told LJ. "I could easily see a role for a Google Books-type service as part of a large whole over time. I could also see this idea thriving in the absence of a Google Books-type service.

"Of course, the outcome of the settlement negotiations and approval process in the Google Books case matters a great deal to the world of library. But the work ... will not rise or fall on what Judge Chin, or anyone else involved, decides," he said, referring to Judge Denny Chin of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, who is the supervising judge for the class-action settlement over Google Book Search.

Carl Malamud, President of PublicResource.org and another member of the steering committee, agreed.

"This isn't an either/or thing ... this is a big ocean to boil and we're all part of the same community trying to make it happen," he told LJ.

Malamud and two other members of the steering committee, Paul Courant, Dean of Libraries at the University of Michigan, and Michael A. Keller, Director of Academic Information Resources at Stanford University, work closely with the Google Books team.

"We hope to emerge with a concrete workplan and a governance structure that represents the consensus of the country's libraries, universities, archives, and museums for moving forward together with a shared vision," Doron Weber, vice president of the Sloan Foundation and a member of the steering committee, said in a press release.

Palfrey said the committee would "float the plan broadly and transparently."

The other members of the steering committee are:

Charles Henry, President of the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)
Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress
Maura Marx, Berkman Center Fellow and Executive Director, Knowledge Commons
Donald Waters, Program Officer for Scholarly Communications and Information Technology at the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation

"It's a small effort with some great people and if it gains traction we hope it will become bigger," Palfrey said.

Some commentators have questioned whether groups such as this one or the Hathi Trust, which are grounded in academia, have a too narrow focus.

"Let's please remember that the culture-oriented priorities of Prof. Darnton and the institutional priorities of HathiTrust are not right for society at large," David Rothman, the founder of TeleRead, wrote in a recent comment on LJ's Digital Libraries blog by Roy Tennant.

"Especially I'm frustrated over the treatment of public libraries as an afterthought, whether the issue is content or governance," he added.

Palfrey said the work would be coordinated across many institutions, including public libraries.

"Maura Marx was recently at the Boston Public Library (and still works actively with the public library community through her nonprofit)," he said of the steering committee member. "We will certainly welcome further participation from public librarians. The Steering Committee is comprised of initial volunteers who have offered to work on this idea and will no doubt grow and change over time, as well."




Reader Comments (3)


"Digital Public Library of America" a noble goal, as long as you do not pillage the work of others as Google & Company (the libraries that supplied Google with in-copyright works)has done. Respect the copyrights of others and your library will have a much stronger foundation. Douglas Fevens The University of Wisconsin, Google, & Me

Posted by Douglas Fevens on December 15, 2010 03:12:51PM

I'm a writer and self-publisher. At a considerable cost of time and money, and for profit. I've worked professionally in publishing for 29 years. I shudder at the idea of organizations blithely deciding whether it's legal to scan my copyrighted books. Especially ones who want to buy exactly one copy of each book so none of other members of the library consortium have to pay anything for it. And then they plan to "lend" it to patrons who can break any DRM--because the page images inevitably appear on the patrons' hardware. From which all these books can be copied and distributed to anyone and everyone--without paying the writers or publishers. Publishing is commercial. Writers need money. They're not actually nobly willing to contribute all that professional labor--plus sizable amounts of money--to support "our cultural heritage." Librarians want and need to get paid, and so do members of all other professions. Any of the idealistic visions I hear of us writers happily working for free, are just attempts to establish a kind of Third-World production of creative works, with the creators being exploited just like the people making running shoes in China for 50 cents an hour. Creators of works are the ones who deserve to benefit financially from them--not the numerous parties currently wanting to seize such works wholesale, without paying, just because it can be done technically.

Posted by Frances Grimble on December 16, 2010 02:09:08PM

Interestingly, a group of library, business and legal professionals have been in conversations for the last two years about a project to tackle this from a grassroots perspective. The result of this planning work, and the beginning of another part of the journey in tackling these issues will launch when our expanded web site for our organization, Library Renewal, goes live on Dec 31st at www.libraryrenewal.org We welcome input from all members or the library community and all the members of the communities that libraries at large serve. While we are in the final pre-launch stages of the org now, with the expanded site launch in just a couple short weeks, our mission, approach and ways for library professionals and the general citizenry to get involved and make a difference will be more clear. Clearly the timing of the announcement mentioned here made all of us working on the org take notice. It truly is the most exciting time ever to work in libraries, eh? We believe that our carefully planned and inclusive approach will bring results that libraries and library lovers around the country, and world, will find refreshing and unique. We are encouraged by the work we see being done here and believe those keenly interested in the topic will find Library Renewal a welcome, legitimate way to be a part of shaping the future of libraries and content access. So please do watch for that site launch! Also,if anyone has questions at all please feel free to email us at info@libraryrenewal.org Thanks and see you on Dec 31st (or after...it seems like a nice way to start the New Year, yes?).

Posted by Michael Porter on December 16, 2010 05:12:23PM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information


 

Welcome the LJ Archives.

This archive site is the home to all LJ articles published prior to January 2012;
Advertisement

LJ Reviews Database

LJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories



From the Blogs



Advertisement

Advertisement

Connect with Library Journal


Follow on Twitter








About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.