Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to LJ Magazine
In the Bookroom   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (3)


The New Classics—You Sure About That?
July 15, 2008

I’ve been catching up with some magazine reading, and buzzed through the June 27/July 4 Entertainment Weekly dedicated to “The New Classics” of film, TV, music, theater, and, of course, books. Although I enjoy reading EW, they often have these goofy lists that don’t ever include their criteria for how they selected the 100 best comedies of all time, etc. This time, however, the criteria were listed, and in part say that the titles in all areas were picked because they are “memorable works that have endured in the public consciousness….”

Okay, but when opening to the book section, the mag’s number one choice is Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, a book that is only two years old. There is another title on the list—Junot Diaz’s The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao—that debuted only last year. How much real enduring have these books done? There are some great titles in here like Updike’s Rabbit at Rest, Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, and Larry McMurtry’s Lonesome Dove, but those books have some mileage on them. Declaring something a classic after only two years seems a tad premature to me. Eye of the beholder, I guess.  


Posted by Michael Rogers on July 15, 2008 | Comments (3)


July 16, 2008
In response to: The New Classics—You Sure About That?
NYC Librarian commented:

How amazing that our society has become so fast paced that even are classics are immediate. Hype and not time appears to be the key ingredient to the contemporary classification of classic.




July 16, 2008
In response to: The New Classics—You Sure About That?
librarianintraining commented:

Personally, I think it has more to do with Oprah than anything. For me, her stamp of approval makes it an automatic bottom of the pile book for me.




July 21, 2008
In response to: The New Classics—You Sure About That?
c.ryan commented:

Unfortunately, I think EW's main concern is not being right, it is selling copies of that particular issue. EW is a fun, breezy read, but it never seems truly concerned with posterity.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements





©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites