Library Journal Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to LJ Magazine
Email
Learn RSS

Tennant: Digital Libraries   



Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (4)


Picking When To Jump

August 31, 2007 Frank Cervone has a nice piece in the July/August issue of Computers in Libraries called "ILS Migration in the 21st Century: Some New Things to Think About This Time Around" (it isn't online, but here's the citation). He's correct in identifying migration from one integrated library system (ILS) to another as being "cyclical in nature," and I think he's correct in predicting that we are entering another such cycle.

Some of this need is being thrust on libraries by vendors pulling systems out from under them (no names here), while other libraries are simply getting antsy for a system that isn't written in Cobol (again, no names). For those with no choice, I wish you luck. I wouldn't want to change vendors now for the world.

For those of you who can wait for a bit, I think now is a great time to do exactly that. Why? Because the ILS market is clearly in upheaval, and anyone who chooses a new system at such a time is basically asking for it. Don't take my word for it, talk to Marshall Breeding, or Andrew Pace, both of whom know so much about the ILS market that it's scary.

Some questions I have are: When will things settle down at SirsiDynix? How long will ExLbris be able to juggle both Voyager and Aleph? Will OCLC (my employer) make another attempt at this space after the failed try in the 80s? Is the market finished with mergers and acquisitions, or are there more deals in the making? Will the invesment firms behind ExLibris and SirsiDynix decide they'd prefer to liquidate assets than try to make a profit in this market? Do the open source options of Evergreen and Koha have enough community support to be good long-term solutions?

These questions may show my ignorance more than my knowledge, but the very fact that at least some of these questions can be credibly asked by someone who tries to pay attention is telling.

Posted by Roy Tennant on August 31, 2007 | Comments (4)


Industries: News & Features
Email
Learn RSS


August 31, 2007
In response to: Picking When To Jump
Dan Scott commented:

A bit of a paradox you've set up there - if everyone listens to your advice to wait and see if a community will develop around Evergreen or Koha, well, I guess it would be pretty much impossible for a community to develop.

When the ILS market is in a state of upheaval, I believe it is the _perfect_ time to make a disruptive choice and change the state of the ILS market for the better. Otherwise, if we allow a currently viable open-source ILS like Evergreen to wither due to fear, we will get what we would deserve: a return to begging for enhancements, with no chance for direct control over one of the core systems that we rely on for the ability to serve our patrons.




September 1, 2007
In response to: Picking When To Jump
jrochkind commented:

"Will OCLC (my employer) make another attempt at this space"

OCLC cataloging tools + OCLC Local + Acquisition/Serials == 'ILS'.

I'd be shocked if there weren't already very serious discussion, if not actually plans, if not actually development already started (actually, more likely to acquire a another company with such a product, since it's OCLC), for the third piece of this at OCLC.




September 5, 2007
In response to: Picking When To Jump
K.G. Schneider commented:

I can't see Evergreen "withering" as long as it is deemed useful for an entire statewide system, and Koha seems to get plenty of users as well. When people aren't getting what they want from an ILS, open source becomes a very sensible alternative. With open code, you can always hire enough programmers to maintain and develop it -- particularly after you've changed your development paradigm from paying vendors to paying programmers to do the work.




September 13, 2007
In response to: Picking When To Jump
John Miller commented:

Just for the sake of the historical record, you might want to refer to OCLC's failed TRIES, rather TRY, in the 80s. I worked for a regional OCLC-supposting network then and knew the OCLC staffer in charge of marketing local systems. I recall her mentioning at one state library conference that this was her third year in a row pitching OCLC local systems at the conference, but that it had been a different system each time. It was pretty funny, at or least seemed so at the time.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

Advertisement

Advertisements





©2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy