Blatant Berry Blog   

My reactions to the sad death of Judith Krug are in Blatant Berry. I hope and believe that Keith Fiels and the powers at ALA are keenly aware that they must search out and find a strong, effective, and high profile candidate to run OIF and maintain ALA's nationally known and strong role in support of intellectual freedom. The job simply must not be given to a non-librarian, or some noisily oustspoken person who is a member-in-good-standing of the gang of "true believers" and hangers on who are such a large faction in ALA's intellectual freedom club.   

Comments (0)

Just after LJ interviewed the candidates for ALA president I received messages from each side. A Stevens supporter sent me a hot link to a Canton Rep article about how the library union in Kent Oliver's library had complained about Oliver using library staffers to work on his campaign. Fortunately for Oliver, the comments following the piece were mostly in his favor (against the union), and most librarians I asked said they couldn't care less if Oliver staffers from the library had volunteered to help him.

Prior to that an Oliver supporter dropped me a note questioning Stevens claim that it was her decision, due to altruism or that it was the right thing to do, to take a leave of absence without pay fr...Read More

Comments (6)

Michael Stephens 3/17 post on Tame the Web...Read More

Comments (3)

There is a sad message from many of the "mentors" on NEWLIB-L, a discussion list for new librarians that is one of my favorites. The list has a home page at NEWLIB-L...Read More

Comments (5)

The discussion triggered by Mary K. Chelton on JESSE and the report by Norman Oder of the North Carolina program to train 300 librarians in job searching for library users, reminded me of Jennie Flexner and the original model of the Readers' Advisor.  

When I was in what we called "Library School" at Simmons College, professor Sigrid Edge told us about working as a Readers' Advisor with Jennie Flexner and her team of librarians at the New York Public Library in the depths of the depression of the 30s. Flexner had them set up booths in the great lobby of NYPL at Fifth Avenue and 42d Street, and people would come with their problems. The librarians would provide books and lib...Read More

Comments (0)

“Bigger is better” was the mantra during the decades following the appropriation of the first federal library money. Many still believe it, but now there are new reasons for doubt. Bigger libraries and library systems are not always stronger or better.

In the 1950s, we thought that small libraries were inherently weak. Many served jurisdictions so small that they were chronically underfunded. Even today, many small libraries can't even afford to hire the professional librarians needed to guarantee excellence.

The argument for bigness, for ensuring that small libraries joined bigger systems, was so inflexible that some states did it by force. Few can forget the war that raged in Florida as state and federal aid were used as a club to compel libraries once governed by communities into new coun...Read More

Comments (1)

When I read the Annoyed Librarian’s posting on September 22 posting on her old blog about how she had sold out to someone, and I tried to post a comment but I couldn’t get it to work. It would have ended with the cheap shot: “You know what they call people who do it for money.” I told Francine about my comment, and after she let out a short gasp, she said, “You don’t come in for our staff meetings, so you probably don’t know that it was us, Library Journal, who offered AL a contract to move her blog to LJ.” I was stunned, but in a second or two I realized what a coup Francine had pulled off. Annoyed Librarian probably has more readers than American Libraries. Of course, my first question to Francine was, “Well, who the hell is this cranky woman?” Francine was ready. “I don’t know,” she said, testing my belief...Read More

Comments (17)

I was amused by the Annoyed Librarian’s  April 16 good old days rant about the beginnings of National Library Week (NLW) when the publishers (the National Book Committee) who started it thought the best strategy to support libraries was to promote reading and books. ALA suckered along. I remember those beginnings, and the angry criticism of the emphasis on reading and books by many library leaders. “Why not call it National Reading Week?” they said. In truth NLW  has not done very much for libraries or books. Despite Annoyed’s assertions to the contrary, the popularity of libraries grows more than...Read More

Comments (1)

Every librarian must read Rebecca Lossin’s “Iraq’s Ruined Library Soldiers On,” in the Nation online. As Lossin, a graduate student in the School of Information and Library Science at Pratt Institute in New York, points out “the lack of solidarity from the American community of librarians and scholars for their Iraqi counterparts is shameful.” American librarianship can take many cues from these embattled Iraqi librarians. Our own professional fate at the hands of our various levels of government is less disastrous, but disaster lurks near every library budget hearing this year.  

 

Comments (0)

In an interesting discussion on the NewlibL list one poster said: "ALA doesn't even list the ALA accredited MLS as a preferred qualification for this job. They are not looking for a librarian to fill this position. This job is usability testing, a skill we all learned in library school. Perhaps they don't think someone who emerged from one of the programs they accredit will do a good enough job at it.  Kinda makes you think, doesn't it?" 
I've been worried about the apparent attack on librarianship's basic credential for quite a while. First there was the hiring of folks without the degree to run many of our major libraries, some of whom were then sent to LIS programs to get the credential, but some of whom weren't. Then there was the birth and promotion of the ICaucus schools, who have promoted only...Read More

Comments (18)

You may not have noticed, but I haven’t blogged here since last April. I was silenced by a combination of other deadlines, technological change, and a beautiful summer of gardening, traveling, and all.

Most important, it was NOT  the argument over anonymous postings which shut me up. Yes, we allow anonymous postings here. And yes, I even agree with the Annoyed Librarian that anonymous postings are protected expression, and our courts and First Amendment apply to them. But Annoyed got very defensive about it all, even quoted a long statement by the Electronic Frontier Foundation about it. But I haven’t changed my mind, and I still think most who hide behind anonymity or some pseudonym are simply cowards, afraid to tell us who they are. I don’t deny them their right to do it, and if I were AL, for ex...Read More

Comments (14)