Library Journal Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to LJ Magazine

CA Library To Debut Netflix-Like “Fines-Free” Program

No free delivery, but Hayward will buy new copies if material requested lingers at home

Norman Oder -- Library Journal, 11/10/2009

  • First program of its kind
  • Starts at $2.99/month
  • Could it raise $112,000 a year?
  • 20% of cardholders get accounts blocked

A Bay Area library is about to test a Netflix-like model in which library users can borrow three items at a tiHayward Public Libraryme for $2.99 a month, five items for $4.99 a month, or up to ten for $8.99 month, with no late fees. (There’s no free shipping, however. Some libraries in New Jersey offer delivery by mail but still charge late fees.)

Sean Reinhart, acting director of the Hayward Public Library, CA, says the “Fines-Free” Library Loan Program, the first of its kind, aims to lure back library users who find their accounts blocked—20% of total users—and give up on the library.

(Hayward has a service population of 150,000, with a main library and a branch, and a collection of some 160,000 items. Here's a background memo [PDF] on the new plan.)

Rationale
“In my nine years talking to library customers on the front lines and in management I’ve learned that the vast majority of library users who get fined are basically responsible people who wanted to return their library books on time, but for whatever reason, didn’t,” Reinhart told LJ. "I know so many people who have given up on libraries either because they have too many fines, or because they want to avoid getting fined in the first place. The system doesn’t fit their schedule, so they don’t use the resource. So I asked myself, why can’t the library let people have a limited number of items for an unlimited length of time in exchange for a monthly fee, just like Netflix?”

While some among that 20% number do pay their fines—in FY09 Hayward collected $94,000 in fines and fees, with 90% of that overdue fines—most simply stop using the library, he said. (The library also charges a $20 billing fee on accounts with overdue materials for more than 45 days.)

“So far the reaction has been tremendously positive,” he said. Library users, city and library staff, and local and state stakeholders all had a chance to weigh in. 

Details
Pricing was set partly by analyzing the cost of operating the program and partly by looking at Netflix and other services. There’s no differentiation as of now between media. The project is a pilot, and subject to change.

Customers can cancel their membership in the “Fines-Free” plan at any time; once a cardholder cancels, or fails to pay the monthly subscription fee, he or she would return to the standard circulation plan, in which most items circulate for 21 days (with a fine of 25 cents daily), and DVDs circulate for a week (with a fine of $1 daily).

The library will rely on e-commerce services that add a service fee per monthly transaction ranging from 30 to 43 cents—far less costly than relying on library staff.

Reinart acknowledge that the library can’t estimate projected revenue, given the novelty of the program. If 2000 cardholders—2% of total—switch to the plan (at the $4.99 level), the annual net revenue would be about $112,000, he said. (The cost of buying replacement materials has not been fully calculated.)

He also noted, “It is understood that not all costs are to be recovered through fees, both from a practical standpoint and considering the public benefits to the community generated with the Fines-Free Program.”

Implications
And what if a cardholder wants a library book or AV item that another cardholder just keeps at home? The library will simply buy another copy—an extension of the principle that multiple copies of popular materials are bought to meet community demand.

The California State Library has provided a written opinion stating that the new plan is consistent with state laws regarding public libraries and equal access.

California State East Bay head librarian Linda Dobb told the Oakland Tribune that the policy might keep research materials away from the public too long. However, Reinhart said the library has few rare materials.

Talkback

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links




 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

MOST POPULAR PAGES

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Norman Oder
    LJ Insider

    November 17, 2009
    Board Backs Cheshire, CT, Director Regarding Controversial Book on Murders
    The board of the Cheshire Public Library, CT, by a 5-1 vote, decided to back the director's decision...
    More
  • Norman Oder
    LJ Insider

    November 12, 2009
    New York Public Library's New Logo Tames a Lion
    Aiming for a more user-friendly logo in multiple media, the New York Public Library has adapted its ...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Design Institute 2007
    December 11, 2007 at Chicago's Harold Washington Library Center:Design Institute 2007
  • Learning Gardens
    New York's GreenBranches program links the library to the street.
  • Green Picks: LBD May 2007
    Want to reduce your library's carbon footprint? Join the Cradle-to-Cradle revolution. Helen Milling shares the green products her firm is using.
Advertisements





LJ NEWSLETTERS

Booksmack
LJXpress
LJ Academic Newswire
LJReview Alert
LJ Criticas Review Alert
SLJ Extra Helping
Curriculum Connections
SLJTeen
PWDaily
Children's Bookshelf
PW Comics Week
Cooking the Books
Religion BookLine
Please read our Privacy Policy
©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites