Library Journal Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to LJ Magazine

Talking About Google Settlement, Publisher Cites Monopoly, Duopoly, and New Library Sales

Andrew Albanese -- Library Journal, 2/27/2009

Go back to the
Academic Newswire
for more stories
  • Chairman of AAP offers predictions
  • Amazon and Google gain duopoly?
  • Revenue stream from libraries?

(This article first appeared in the February 26 issue of the LJ Academic Newswire. For a set of links, go to LibraryJournal.com/GoogleBookSearchSettlement.)

As the library community prepares to voice its concerns in an amicus brief for the upcoming Google Book Search approval hearing a driving force behind the settlement last week acknowledged the validity those concerns. According to report on the web site Ars Technica, Richard Sarnoff, chairman of the Association of American Publishers, said that while publishers didn’t intend to create a monopoly in the market for book search engines or online book sales, the settlement could have that effect.

In a thoughtful talk on the settlement at Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy, Sarnoff, also speculated that the Google Book Search settlement “could create a duopoly in the electronic books market” between its two biggest players—Amazon and Google. 

He also reportedly acknowledged that deal created an attractive revenue stream from library subscriptions. Under terms of the deal, Google plans to sell institutional subscriptions to libraries for access to the complete book catalog—except for free access at a limited number of designated terminals.Most of that revenue, 67 percent, will go to publishers. Sarnoff also acknowledged access to the books will continue only “as long as Google exists.”

Sarnoff’s talk seemed to validate areas of concern among librarians, issues at the heart of a probing critique by Harvard University librarian Robert Darnton. Darnton, a renowned historian of the book, warned in that essay of the potential for a monopoly on books, for unchecked pricing, and a tipping of the copyright balance away from the libraries and the public interest toward a pay-per-view world.

Read more Newswire stories:

Library Organizations To File Amicus Brief in Google Book Search Settlement

Layoffs at Harvard? Skidding Economy Could Claim Books, Jobs

Lawsuit Dismissed in Botched UConn Law Library

Announcement: Library Journal Spring Book Buzz Webcast

People

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links




 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Cheryl LaGuardia
    E-Views

    November 8, 2009
    Piggy Trouble
    Given my near obsession with the swine flu, I found this graphic history and information overview of...
    More
  • Cheryl LaGuardia
    E-Views

    November 7, 2009
    That Song is in My Head and I Like It
    So I recently discovered that Pink Martini has had TWO albums out since the last one I knew about (H...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Design Institute 2007
    December 11, 2007 at Chicago's Harold Washington Library Center:Design Institute 2007
  • Learning Gardens
    New York's GreenBranches program links the library to the street.
  • Green Picks: LBD May 2007
    Want to reduce your library's carbon footprint? Join the Cradle-to-Cradle revolution. Helen Milling shares the green products her firm is using.
Advertisements





LJ NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

LJ BookSmack
LJXPRESS
LJ ACADEMIC NEWSWIRE
LJ REVIEW ALERT
LJ Criticas Review Alert
©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites