Library Journal Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to LJ Magazine

OCA To Scan Orphan Works; Publishers Float Orphan Works Solution

Andrew Albanese -- Library Journal, 10/29/2007

It's beginning to look like there could be movement on orphan works in 2008 after a coalition of three professional publishing associations released the broad strokes of a statement regarding use of such works. Separately, the Open Content Alliance said it would begin scanning some orphan works for distribution through a groundbreaking digital interlibrary loan system. 
OCA officials said the Boston Public Library, the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole, and Universidad Francisco Marroquin in Guatemala City, in conjunction with the Internet Archive, would scan works that were out-of-print but in-copyright and pioneer "a digital interlibrary loan service" around them. "We believe this can be a tremendously valuable way to increase scholarly and public access to hard-to-find resources," OCA officials said in a statement. "For every librarian who has received a request for a book that is out-of-print (as opposed to out-of-stock), this initiative will provide a mechanism to meet the library patron's needs." The announcement marks a departure of sorts, as the OCA has thus far stuck to scanning materials in the public domain or works with permission.
On the O'Reilly Radar blog, the University of California's Peter Brantley called the announcement "noteworthy." "[It] could be reasonably understood to be a reassertion of inter-library loan rights under the first-sale doctrine," he said, noting that the solution required the engineering of "technical and policy systems which acceptably minimize risk of digital abuse." 
Three trade associations, the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP), the International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers (STM), and the Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division (PSP) of the Association of American Publishers, issued a  draft statement. It outlines an emerging consensus among publishers that users who conduct a reasonably "diligent" copyright search would be subject only to "a normal license fee and will not be subject to any statutory, punitive or special fees or damages," should a copyright holder later emerge. They argue that "a private solution," as opposed to government intervention through legislation, was the best course of action.

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links




 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

MOST POPULAR PAGES

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Margaret Heilbrun
    In the Bookroom

    September 25, 2009
    English Vacation, English Reading
    Here are some bibliographic gleanings from my vacation earlier this month in England, my first ...
    More
  • Wilda Williams
    In the Bookroom

    August 17, 2009
    Joseph Finder's Twitter Book Tour
    Last March I blogged about thriller author Joseph Finder's entry into the bold new world of Twi...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • Design Institute 2007
    December 11, 2007 at Chicago's Harold Washington Library Center:Design Institute 2007
  • Learning Gardens
    New York's GreenBranches program links the library to the street.
  • Green Picks: LBD May 2007
    Want to reduce your library's carbon footprint? Join the Cradle-to-Cradle revolution. Helen Milling shares the green products her firm is using.
Advertisements





LJ NEWSLETTERS


Booksmack
LJXpress
LJ Academic Newswire
LJReview Alert
LJ Criticas Review Alert
SLJ Extra Helping
Curriculum Connections
SLJTeen
PWDaily
Children's Bookshelf
PW Comics Week
Cooking the Books
Religion BookLine
Please read our Privacy Policy
©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites