Letters
Staff -- Library Journal, 4/15/2003
A dangerous message
As I read the results of the Library Research Center's privacy survey (News , LJ 2/15/03, p. 16), I heard the unmistakable ringing of warning bells…. Although the government enacted the USA PATRIOT Act to "protect" U.S. Citizens, one wonders which citizens they had in mind. The act calls into question a librarian's role in this increasingly suspicious society. Reading about the many patrons and librarians who reported suspected terrorist behavior and the shocking number who claimed staff felt "more suspicious of Middle Eastern patrons," I was reminded of the not too distant past when political propaganda seeped into the minds of otherwise sensible adults. During the Cold War, reputations and livelihoods were stripped from many innocent people in the name of protecting our nation. People tossed about the accusation of "Communist" as they now bandy about the term "terrorist"….
Librarians…are representatives of and spokespeople for the larger society, which includes all Americans. According to the Library Bill of Rights, we have a duty to provide equitable service to patrons, regardless of "age, background, or views." In the survey, only 5.5 percent said they would "definitely" challenge a court order for disclosure of patron information. Accepting such an obvious affront to the privacy rights of patrons without question sends a dangerous message to the public.
We should not ignore laws, but when we simply accept
rules that are contrary to the fundamental tenets of the library philosophy
without a fight, then we must seriously question the future stability of the
institution.
—Andrea Mettert, MLS Student, Indiana Univ.–Purdue Univ., Indianapolis
There is no shortage
I know people who have their MLS from good programs who
are having a terrible time finding professional library positions. Academic,
public, and government libraries are cutting their budgets with meat axes.
People on search committees tell me they get hundreds of applicants for each
position. There is clearly no shortage of qualified librarians. Why, then, are
we trying to get more people to go into MLS programs (Michael Rogers, "Tackling
Recruitment ," LJ 2/1/03, p. 40–43) to flood an
already glutted market?
—Bruce A. Wilson, Charleston, WV
Educated for service
I am in total agreement with your editorial "Recruit New Librarians
at Work " (LJ 2/1/03, p. 8). I'm working on my LTA
at College of DuPage, IL, and am enjoying the program. As a staff member of the
Manhattan Public Library District (administrative assistant), I can say that the
program is increasing my understanding of the "library world." The director and
library board are very supportive and allow flexibility in scheduling to
coincide with class schedules. The board provides for our tuition. A more
educated staff member provides better service to the patron.
—Noreen Bormet, Manhattan P.L. Dist., IL
An inspiration!
Congratulations for selecting Raymond Santiago as Librarian of the Year (LJ 1/03, p. 44–46). An operating budget increase of almost $20 million in four years and planning 18 new library facilities demonstrate his extraordinary leadership. His ability to persuade Miami-Dade County, FL, officials of the great value libraries bring to building stronger communities is an inspiration to all library advocates.
In recognizing Santiago, you have honored the community that the Miami-Dade Public Library System (MDPLS) serves. The county covers almost 2000 square miles, has a population of more than 2.2 million, and is 58 percent Hispanic. MDPLS serves people from 170 countries who speak more than 130 languages.
How does Santiago do it? As he says, "The key is being
aware of the political realities…. More than anything else I believe that
service has to come first."
—Tom Sloan, Exec. Dir., SEFLIN Inc., Fort Lauderdale, FL
Equal library service
Nice editorial, John Berry ("Beyond Party
Politics ," LJ 12/02, p. 8)! I wondered when I was
on a "busperson's" holiday why there was such uniformity in the level of service
in libraries across our country. Now I understand; it's because the "federal and
state governments... came to agree that higher levels of government
must...ensure that citizens in one jurisdiction have services as effective as
those in another." Ouch! I just bit my tongue-in-cheek.
—David L. Cooper, Dir., Noblesville-Southeastern P.L., Noblesville, IN
That editorial
Bravo, John Berry ("Beyond Party
Politics ," LJ 12/02, p. 8)!
—Madison Mosley Jr., Dir., Law Lib., Stetson Univ. Coll. of Law, Gulfport, FL
Ironic tattlers?
Regarding the report "Ottawa PL Staffers
Protest Net Porn " (News, LJ 3/15/03, p. 24), did
anyone else think it ironic that librarians do not want to limit intellectual
freedom so they allow their patrons to view porn sites at the library, but they
don't see a problem with recording where they have been?
—Karen Gillespie, Grayson Cty. P.L., Leitchfield, KY


















